http://www.hba.org.my/

a) Cracks - structural and non structural
b) Car porch floor finishes - edge of floor tiles
chipped. Concrete imprint cracks, floor sealer unevenly
applied and uneven tonality.
c) Auto gate frequently out of order.
d) Coarse and trowelled smooth plastering uneven in terms
of texture especially piping area and electrical points
area.
e) Party wall between neighbouring unit is only 4 1/2″ thick instead of 9″ thick thus gives a bad acoustic properties not mentioning whether adhere to Bomba’s requirement of having 2 hour rated party walls.
f) All floor finishes especially living hall and kitchen bad poor workmanship ( uneven ). Poor grouting appication and poor gradient sense.
g) Timber floor works - timber expanded due to moiture content not observed and treated. Classic example was my unit were laid with soaked wet timber due to stocks were piled up in the room is yet to be water tight ( window panels weren’t installed ) Spoken to IOI about the potential defects BUT were told contractually they are liable to rectify defects works shall any arise. Conclusion, IOI have engaged non experience human resources to represent them. Sad……..!
h) Paint works can even last a year. What sort of QA & QC IOI adopt? Paint suppiers should warrant or guranttee jointly with appicator to IOI at least 5 years to 10 years. What happened here? Too much discount or lack of supervision or something else ??
i) Roof leakage - major issue. Poor workmanship and supervision of something else.
j) Roof timber trusses system were timber battens are poorly designed in terms of spacings. At least, at ceiling opening area timber battens has to be at least 2″ x 3″ for human to lift themself up NOT 1″ x 2″ ceiling battens. Hip joints & ridge capping were overlook in cementing and if there is cement, poorly done. Poor supervision or something else……..!
k) Island road kerbs fontage of all units especially at Puteri 12 area are nuisance……! Poor design. Afterall, road between units are not leanient enough unlike BUKIT JELUTONG PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT. In comparison, IOI are too blind to observe PIONEER DEVELOPER like GUTHRIE, proven historical success and development criteria.
l) Latent defects like internal water piping leaks - what can u ” IOI ” do for me or the rest of the owners. This is very disturbing having bought a property from a so called reutable developer recognised by the goverment. I think a study on customers satisfaction ought to be held to gain feedbacks and complaints.
j) Having said all the above, it has been a norm of our local developers and contractors to deliberately cause inconvenience to buyers and i strongly believe goverment MUST implement policies to developers to built first, obtain CF not TCF and launch sales. Loans to be interest free to developers during the course of constrcution and only takes effect on interest charges upon launching of sales and from the blessing of goverment’s letter of consent for sales.

I dare IOI to hold a open meeting with owners and purchasers to get our feedbacks and i can guarantee, statistically there will be more dissappointed owners than non-dissap owners.

All the retension monies held back from the subcons are not managed well enough…. thats for sure or something else.

you may want to read the write-up here.

plan to get one unit there….BUT look at the comment above, ‘colder heart’ now…